Ep 310: How Big a Hinge Gap/Spine Piece?

Bookbinding

I did something I should have done when I first started making books, but was too naive (dumb?) to do. I recommend new bookbinders do this activity. 

I made three A6-sized blank notebooks with five signatures of five folios each for a total of 100 pages. They were made with two different hinge gaps and three different spine pieces. This was a mistake. They should have been made with three different hinge gaps instead of two. Why did I make three books like this? Again, just to see how they all turned out. Also, to learn more about hinge gaps — the space between the spine and the book board — and spine pieces.

The Liszt/McCartney Notebook’s hinge gap was 5 mm. The spine piece was the size of the text block (6 mm). This, I discovered, is too small for both the spine piece and the hinge gap. However, it has been my go-to-size for the hinge gap for far too long.

The Harrison/Handel Notebook’s hinge gap was 8.0 mm, and its spine piece was the size of the text block plus one book board. The book board was 2 mm. This was a good size; I liked it and will  remember these dimensions on my next book. My next book might well be Truckin’ which I’ll tell you about in a future episode, but for now, let it be known it is yet another experiment and deals with art with a capital A. Stay tuned.

The Lennon/Mozart Notebook’s hinge gap was also 8.0 mm, but the spine piece was the size of the text block (6 mm) plus the size of two book boards (a total of 4 mm). This is the traditional measurement for the spine piece. However, I felt that it was too large. But the hinge gap was good. 

For my next book, I will make the hinge gap 7 mm with the spine piece a text block and one book board to see if it is as good as the Harrison/Handel Notebook, or if 8.0 or larger is the way to go. I have seen binders using 9.5 mm hinge gaps (Sea Lemon). I think 9.5 mm might be good for larger books (B5 or more?). For an A6-sized pocketbook, I like 8.0 mm. Maybe 7.5 mm? 

Who knows? That’s why bookbinding is such an Adventure, yes? Yes!

Stay tuned for the next adventure.

Fiction

Naturally, I’ve been working on Agnes Grout. In one segment involving Polly, the Ashanti slave from what is now known as Ghana, I needed to introduce a new character: Cadwallader Milhous, a Quaker. And this has led me into Developing a Character.

When first introduced, Cadwallader was simple. He was an info dump character. He was introduced to move the plot and nothing more. This didn’t sit well with me. I needed him to be more. I gave him the three requirements for a memorable character: language quirks and ticks, a body, and a motivation.

Taking the body first, he was originally described as a tall, thin, angry man. He morphed into a rotund Benjamin-Franklin-ish fellow. Having a body kind of dictates how the character moves and movement can show the reader what the character means and desires. This is the least important attribute, but the writer needs to see her characters before she can use them in her novels.

The language he uses has more tag questions than most people use: You’re Polly from Lowell, right? You want to be moving back to Africa, aren’t you? Plus, he interrupts himself a little bit: I’m from – we’re all from – Boston, you see? 

His motivation, which he doesn’t express openly because that would make him an Info-Dump character, is to guide Polly through the labyrinth that is the US judicial system in the 1840s, which didn’t take too kindly to runaway slaves. Which Polly wasn’t, but she was the wrong skin tone to argue the point. 

Visuals

A video of the Three Books I made for your listening and watching pleasure is up on YouTube.